monsys vs

monsys.ai vs Tenable

Tenable is the heavyweight in exposure management: Nessus as the scan engine, plus cloud, identity, OT and external attack surface in the Tenable One platform. monsys is deliberately narrower: servers, from monitoring to attested remediation and signed evidence, EU-hosted. Honest comparison below.

tradeoffs

Eerlijke feature-vergelijking

Dimensionmonsys.aiTenable
Target audience and onboardingEU SMB and mid-market: install the agent, data within minutes~Enterprise-first: powerful, but a rollout project with a dedicated security team
Platform breadth~Servers (Linux/Windows) plus AI observability, deliberately narrowVM, web app scanning, cloud (CNAPP), identity, OT/IoT and external ASM in one platform
In-host CVE detectionApp dependencies + OS packages + kernel (backport-aware), plus SBOM/VEX exportNessus engine: the industry reference in vulnerability scanning for years
PrioritisationBlast radius via your own network topology, internet-facing paths and capacity trendsVPR scores and attack path analysis across the platform
RemediationAttested loop: operator approves with TOTP, rollback on failure, every step signed~Separate patch management module; no attestation chain over the fix itself
Evidence for auditorsEd25519-signed audit packs, verifiable offline without trusting us~Compliance dashboards and reports, not cryptographically signed
Monitoring, uptime and capacityIncluded: metrics, alerts, uptime checks, status pages, capacity predictionNo operational monitoring, pure exposure management
Active attack detectionAuth-log analysis, honeypots, GeoIP and lateral-movement correlation on the host~AD/identity attack detection in a separate module; no host runtime detection
Data residency and sovereigntyEU: hosted in Belgium (GoTrust BV), no US SaaS in the critical path~US vendor; cloud platform with region choice, on-prem possible via Security Center
Price and entry threshold5 agents free forever, then €3 per server per month, public~VM from ±$3,700 per year at a 100-asset minimum; full Tenable One quote-only
kies monsys.ai als…

Choose monsys.ai when…

  • You are an EU organisation with data sovereignty as a hard requirement: everything in Belgium, no US cloud.
  • You have no dedicated security team and want one tool combining monitoring, exposure and evidence.
  • Your auditor (NIS2, ISO 27001) wants evidence that is independently verifiable, not just a dashboard export.
  • You want to start today, without a 100-asset minimum or a quoting process.
kies Tenable als…

Choose Tenable when…

  • You are an enterprise with a security team and a broad attack surface: cloud, OT, identity, web apps.
  • You need CNAPP, external ASM or web app scanning on top of classic vulnerability management.
  • Your customers or auditors explicitly require Nessus scans as the industry standard.
  • You already run a Tenable ecosystem or SOC integrations where exposure data must land.
eerlijk gezegd

Tenable wins on raw scan breadth and depth: Nessus is the reference for good reasons, and Tenable One covers surfaces we deliberately do not touch (cloud config, OT, identity). We win on simplicity, price, EU sovereignty, attested remediation and signed evidence. Below roughly 100 servers without a dedicated security team, Tenable is often overkill; the 100-asset minimum speaks for itself. Above that, with your own SOC, Tenable is a logical choice and monsys can deliver the monitoring and the evidence chain alongside it.

Try monsys for freeDocs
other comparisons
vs Zabbixvs Datadogvs Prometheus + Grafanavs Nagiosvs Langfusevs Intruder