monsys vs

monsys.ai vs Intruder

Intruder is a UK vulnerability scanner that looks at your attack surface from the outside: external perimeter, subdomains, cloud assets and web apps. monsys looks from the inside, with an agent on every host. Both position around CTEM. Honest comparison below.

tradeoffs

Eerlijke feature-vergelijking

Dimensionmonsys.aiIntruder
Vantage pointInside-out: agent sees packages, kernel, services, auth logsOutside-in: external perimeter, subdomains, cloud assets
DAST / web app & API scanningNot present, only external uptime and TLS checksBuilt in: authenticated web app scans and API scanning
In-host CVE detectionApp dependencies + OS packages + kernel (backport-aware), plus SBOM/VEX~Agent-based internal scanning only in higher tiers, no kernel backport detection or SBOM
RemediationControlled fix flow: operator approves with TOTP, with rollback and attestation chain~Ticket to Jira/Slack; execution and proof stay with you
Evidence for auditorsEd25519-signed audit packs, verifiable offline without trusting us~Audit-ready PDF reports and sync to Drata/Vanta, not cryptographically verifiable
Validation after a fixVerify step in the remediation loop: agent re-measures and attests the resultAutomatic external re-scan confirms the issue is closed
Monitoring, uptime and capacityIncluded: metrics, alerts, uptime checks, status pages, capacity predictionNo operational monitoring, pure security scanning
Active attack detectionAuth-log analysis, honeypots, GeoIP and lateral-movement correlation on the hostNo runtime detection; scans vulnerabilities, not attacks
Data residencyEU: hosted in Belgium (GoTrust BV), no US SaaS in the critical path~United Kingdom: adequacy decision, but not an EU member state
Pricing model5 agents free forever, then €3 per server per month, public~Base fee plus per-target pricing; paid tiers quote-only
kies monsys.ai als…

Choose monsys.ai when…

  • You run the servers yourself and want to know what is vulnerable inside those hosts: packages, kernel, dependencies.
  • You want to not only find vulnerabilities but demonstrably fix them, with signed evidence for an auditor.
  • EU data residency is a hard requirement (NIS2, DORA, public sector or healthcare).
  • You want monitoring, uptime and security in one tool instead of a separate scanner next to your monitoring stack.
kies Intruder als…

Choose Intruder when…

  • Your biggest risk sits in public web apps and APIs: DAST scanning is exactly their strength and we do not have it.
  • You want to map your external attack surface (forgotten subdomains, open ports, cloud assets) without installing agents.
  • You mostly run on managed cloud services where you cannot install an agent.
  • You already use Drata or Vanta and want scan results to land there automatically.
eerlijk gezegd

Intruder and monsys overlap in positioning (CTEM, small security teams) but barely in technique: they look from the outside, we look from the inside. For many organisations the honest conclusion is that both make sense side by side: Intruder for the external attack surface and web apps, monsys for what lives inside your servers, the controlled fix and the signed evidence. If you pick only one and you run servers yourself, inside-out is usually the bigger blind spot.

Try monsys for freeDocs
other comparisons
vs Zabbixvs Datadogvs Prometheus + Grafanavs Nagiosvs Langfusevs Tenable